![]() What is needed, according to Osho, is contentment and not consolation and contentment comes only when one is not comparing. His interpretation reflects the Taoist vision.Ĭonfucius believes in consolations whereas Tao believes in contentment. According to Osho the monk’s happiness is a comparative happiness which is a pseudo-happiness. The monk says that everybody is going to die and everybody else is poor and hence he doesn’t feel miserable either. The monk feels himself happy because he at the age of ninety is still healthy and alive when so many others have died at their prime young age. So never ask reasons for someone’s happiness it is just like asking why somebody is healthy.Also, there cannot be many joys. “Good!” says Confucius, “here is a man who knows how to console himself.”īy interpreting the story Osho says that there cannot be any reason for joy as it is natural like one’s health. Abiding by the norm, awaiting my end, what is there to be concerned about?” For all men, poverty is the norm and death is the end. ![]() People are born who do not live a day or a month, but I have already lived to ninety. “ Of the myriad things which heaven begot, mankind is the most noble - and I have the luck to be human. In one of the parables Confucius asks a poor wandering monk who is singing a song of joy: “Master, what is the reason for your joy?” Confucius is used as a laughing stock in Taoist stories, where he is figured as a traveller going from somewhere to somewhere, always seeking and searching for knowledge. Osho, in this book, comments on five Taoist parables, which according to him are very deep and they have to be penetrated and meditated upon to know the real meaning. The bird has flown but no marks are left it is a pathless path. Tao means the way, which is more like a bird flying in the sky leaving no markers behind. Since his death in 1990, the influence of his teachings continues to expand, reaching seekers of all ages in virtually every country of the world. He has been described by the Sunday Times of London as one of the “1000 Makers of the 20th Century” and by Sunday Mid-Day (India) as one of the ten people―along with Gandhi, Nehru, and Buddha―who have changed the destiny of India. “Best Be Still, Best Be Empty” discusses the difference between the path of the will, the via affirmitiva of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, versus the path of the mystic, the via negativa of Buddha and Lao Tzu.Tao: The Pathless Path also features a Q&A section that addresses how Taoist understanding applies to everyday life in concrete, practical terms.Osho challenges readers to examine and break free of the conditioned belief systems and prejudices that limit their capacity to enjoy life in all its richness. Leih Tzu was a well-known Taoist master in the fourth century B.C., and his sly critiques of a Confucius provide abundant opportunities for the reader to explore the contrasts between the rational and irrational, the male and female, the structured and the spontaneous.“Who Is Really Happy” uses the discovery of a human skull on the roadside to probe into the question of immortality and how misery arises out of the existence of the ego.“A Man Who Knows How to Console Himself” looks beneath the apparent cheerfulness of a wandering monk and asks if there is really a happiness that endures through life’s ups and downs.“No Regrets” is a parable about the difference between the knowledge that is gathered from the outside and the “knowing” that arises from within.“No Rest for the Living” uses a dialogue between a despondent seeker and his master to reveal the limits of philosophy and the crippling consequences of living for the sake of some future goal. ![]() In Tao: The Pathless Path, Osho, one of the greatest spiritual teachers of the twentieth century, comments on five parables from the Leih Tzu, bringing a fresh and contemporary interpretation to the ancient wisdom of Tao.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |